What a dispute clause decides
After reading, a reader will understand what an arbitration, mediation or court clause changes in law, and why the document a clause sits in affects whether it survives.
4 min read
Placeholder content, pending legal review
A dispute clause decides who sets the terms when agreement fails. It allocates three things before anyone is in conflict: forum, procedure, and the point at which a decision becomes binding.
Where the clause sits. Article 6(3) of Federal Decree-Law No. 37 of 2022 on Family Businesses provides that where the articles of association and the charter conflict, the articles of association apply, and any conflicting provision is repealed from the charter. A procedure recorded only in a charter therefore ranks below one recorded in the articles of association. Article 22(1) covers a different case: where the text of either is absent or ambiguous, both are interpreted according to the common intention of the founders and partners.
What each clause produces. Article 19(1) allows the constitutional documents to form an internal board to consider disputes and attempt to reconcile them, issuing recommendations. Article 19(5) allows the parties to a dispute to agree instead on arbitration under the legislation in force in the State, or on the courts of the financial free zones.
An arbitration clause changes what a court will do. Federal Law No. 6 of 2018 on Arbitration requires the agreement to be in writing under Article 7(1), and Article 4(1) requires it to be made by a natural person with legal capacity to act or by an authorised representative of a legal person. An agreement failing either requirement is null and void. Article 4(2) provides that arbitration is not allowed where matters cannot be submitted to conciliation. Article 4(4) provides that, unless the parties agree otherwise, the agreement survives the death or withdrawal of a party and may be enforced by or against that party's legal successor. Under Article 8 a court declares such an action inadmissible where the defendant raises the plea before any claim or defence on the substance, unless it finds the agreement null and void or incapable of being performed. Under Article 52 an award binds the parties and has the force of res judicata, provided a court recognition decision is obtained for enforcement. Article 55(2) has recognition ordered within 60 days of the request, and Article 54(2) bars an action in nullity after 30 days from notification of the award.
A mediation clause does something different. Federal Decree-Law No. 40 of 2023 on Mediation and Conciliation in Civil and Commercial Disputes, which repealed the 2016 and 2021 instruments, provides that a court with which a case is filed about a dispute already referred to a mediator suspends it until the mediation procedures are completed, provided the defendant invokes the point before any motion or plea on the merits, unless the mediation agreement is null and void and impossible to implement. A ratified settlement agreement binds the parties, has the same probative force as a court judgment and serves as a writ of execution. Mediation depends on participation: under the DIAC Mediation Rules 2023, where the responding party files no reply within 15 days, it is deemed not to consent and the mediation does not proceed. A mediation clause therefore sets a step, not an outcome.
Which court, if a court. Under Article 5(A)(2) of Dubai Law No. 12 of 2004 as amended in 2011, the DIFC Courts may hear civil or commercial claims where the parties agree in writing to file with them, before or after the dispute arises, provided that agreement is made pursuant to specific, clear and express provisions.
Where the forum itself is contested. Dubai Decree No. 29 of 2024 constitutes a judicial tribunal, chaired by the Chief Justice of the Dubai Court of Cassation and including DIFC Courts members, to determine which body has jurisdiction where a conflict arises, and which judgment is enforceable where two conflict. Its decisions are final and not subject to any appeal, and the rules of law it establishes bind all judicial bodies, including the DIFC Courts, as precedent.
Read together, these provisions describe a trade. A clause narrows who decides, and fixes that choice in advance. Absent a clause, Article 19(2) sends the matter to the emirate committee, and any move to arbitration or a financial free zone court then needs both sides to agree under Article 19(5).
Sources, retrieved 11 August 2026: Federal Decree-Law No. 37 of 2022, Federal Law No. 6 of 2018 and Federal Decree-Law No. 40 of 2023 from UAE government sources; Decree No. 29 of 2024 from the Dubai Legislation portal; Dubai Law No. 12 of 2004 as amended and the DIAC Mediation Rules 2023 from the rule-makers.
This is educational content, written with law firms. It describes mechanisms and recommends none of them. Nothing here has been verified or endorsed by the programme as appropriate for any particular family, and a family should take its own legal advice on its own facts.
Gold Standards
Educational only, not legal advice
Next guideA charter with no forum to use it: the bodies a charter presupposes